|















|
|
Innovation
We utilize the most advanced
and proven dental delivery systems from the most well respected
manufacturers in the world. We invite you to visit their websites for more
information - simply click on the photos.
| i ) Operatory &
Delivery Systems |
 |
|
 |
|
KaVo Environment Chair |
|
KaVo Electric
Handpiece - "The Drill" |
|
"It's the result of extensive research including input from more than 1,500
dentists, 5 U.S. dental schools, 36 U.S. dental dealers & a select panel of
leading clinicians and equipment experts.
The chair has been designed for optimum convenience and comfort for
dentists and patients of all sizes, shapes, and heights as well as for
patients with disabilities." KAVO
|
|
A dramatic departure from the
traditional dental drill.
"Over 25 years ago, KaVo invented the first electric dental
motor and attachment. So it’s no wonder KaVo leads the field with advanced
third generation technology – the new ELECTROtorque plus with brushless
motor technology. KaVo isn’t just jumping on the electric bandwagon. We
built the wagon. And, while new to the US, the brushless motor 700KL is the
result of more than 25 years of experience. The 700KL has proven itself for
more than 4 years in thousands of practices worldwide."
KAVO |
| ii) Computerized
Anesthetic - The Wand - "The Needle" |
|
 |
"Patients who have experienced a Wand injection are
amazed at how comfortable it is. ..fear and anxiety levels...were
dramatically reduced from just one Wand injection. The core technology of
The Wand is the computer controlled delivery of anesthetic solution at a
constant flow rate, regardless of variation in tissue resistance. The Wand
delivers an anesthetic drip which precedes the needle, creating an
anesthetic pathway and combined with the controlled flow rate results in
an effective and often pain-free injection."
MILESTONE SCIENTIFIC |
| iii) Digital Imaging
|
 |
We utilize a digital camera to
record intra- and extra-oral images as part of our comprehensive new
patient examination. This provides us with documentation for analysis and
treatment planning, and also an historical record.
|
|
|
| iv) Digital Radiography
|
 |
Digital
radiography is becoming more popular. Unfortunately, digital imaging
systems cannot solve every radiographic problem. The resolution of digital
systems is typically not as good as film-based systems1,2
|
|
Personal
communications with Dr. E. Lam, Oral and Maxillofacial Radiologist and
AHFMR (Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research) clinical
investigator, resulted in
the following concerns:
a) the dose
reductions that are claimed by the digital imaging manufacturers are made
in comparison to D-speed film; higher speed films (E- and F-)
reduces exposure by more than 50%. Peninsula Dental Centre uses
F-speed film and long-cone collimation (a specific technique) which
further reduces exposure by 50-60%.
b) There is a
reported higher rate of re-exposure with digital radiography.
c) Intra-oral
film resolution is superior - reported to be 20 and 22 line pairs per
millimeter, some digital systems have resolutions of only 9 line pairs per
mm.
Film is still
the "gold standard" for radiography.
Continuing advances in digital
imagery and improvements in computer software may decrease these concerns
in the near future. When that time comes, and if it is in the best interest
of the patient, Peninsula Dental Centre will incorporate this technology
into our practice.
|
| v) Light Curing Technology. |
 |
As we are a mercury
amalgam-free practice, virtually all of our restorative materials are
self-curing, or more frequently, light-curing. This requires careful
clinical technique, choice of materials, and the best method of curing
available. |
| We use the award-winning, most highly rated light cure available:
the Demetron 501. This allows us to not only set the protocol for curing
individually, but also access to the most powerful and effective light
cure available. |
|
1 - Huda et al
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83(6): 725-731
2 - Ludlow et al
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;79(1): 105-113
|
|