There are numerous researchers, clinicians, professional bodies, and consumers who have contrary positions regarding the use of amalgam as a restorative material. Given the complexity of the issue we have chosen to simplify our position as follows: 

Until all concerned parties can accept a definitive answer, we treat mercury-containing materials as all other governing bodies outside of dentistry – as potentially harmful and toxic.

This does not mean we are concerned about existing, stable restorations. Simply that we choose not to place more of them. 

As with any restoration, if an amalgam filling is failing, then it should be replaced. At Peninsula Dental this means choosing an alternative material. 

For those interested in information on both sides of the issues, more information is available below:

Pro:
Canadian Dental Association
American Dental Association

Con:
Health Canada Position Statement
National Institute for Science, Law, and Public Policy, Washington D.C.

Return to questions